I found this emotions wheel from BEAM, and loved the messiness of it. It's not just this perfect circle with perfect colors. It's alive.
My most succinct answer is: It's both. It's why I did this (SURMOUNT) clinical trial. I'm catching potential future cancer cells before they have a chance to attach to an organ and become metastatic if the study (ABBY) medication(s) work as intended. It's bad that I have them though as it greatly increases my risk of metastatic cancer if we can't kill them with these study (ABBY) medication(s). Makes my approach proactive and not just reactive. The current practice without clinical trials is waiting to treat it until it has metastasized.
The words I've used to some is "scientifically inevitable". Let us remember I have triple positive breast cancer which is HER2+ and HR+ and I had a residual cancer burden (or not a pathologic completed response) after chemotherapy prior to surgery (neoadjuvant).
Let us consider:
First 5 Years: HER2-positive (HER2+) recurrences most commonly appear within the first five years, often peaking around 20 months to 3 years after diagnosis.
Beyond 5 Years: Because of the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) component, patients carry a steady, persistent long-term risk of late recurrence that can extend past 5 to 10 years post-surgery.
Other Risk Factors:
- Tumor Burden: Larger primary tumor size and residual cancer burden remaining after initial treatment increase risk.
- Pathologic Response: Not achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant (pre-surgery) treatment elevates recurrence potential.
Other Considerations:
Site of recurrence: If it returns as metastatic (distant) disease, HER2-positive (HER2+) cancer has a higher tendency to recur in the brain compared to some other subtypes.
Let us remember, this is why I chose to enter these clinical trials, so others may live.

